sugar: (Default)
Kath ([personal profile] sugar) wrote2012-01-19 07:57 pm

Book talk

Happy Buffy's Birthday, everyone!

It's a little freakish how much I've been enjoying winter so far. I even shoveled. On purpose.

I finished Stephen King's Desperation a few days ago and now every Canesten commercial I see fills me with revulsion. It was truly his most viscerally grotesque book, and I say that having read most, but not all of his books - it can only be tied in grossness, never surpassed. And I have read some disgusting shit!

I found it reasonably compelling, and the kid at its centre was endlessly fascinating as a character. The end felt rushed, though, and almost forcibly expels the reader from the inner journey of one of its main characters, whose thoughts and POV have been prevalent all along. That was odd.

It was no 11.22.63 or Under The Dome, both of which I read in the past couple of months.

Despite my lukewarm review, Desperation's companion book, The Regulators, is in my virtual to-read pile for sometime later this year. I've never read a Bachman book before, so that should be interesting.

Right now I'm nearly done with Charles Portis's True Grit, which is a fantastic read, although a bit redundant if you've seen the Cohen brothers movie. They stayed so close to the book it's almost uncomfortable. I've seen the movie 4 times and I can almost anticipate the end of the sentence I'm reading when I turn the page.

I expect I'll be adding that one to the list tomorrow. But for now:

2012 Books:
#2: 2012-01-06 to 2012-01-16 - Desperation, Stephen King
causeways: (Default)

[personal profile] causeways 2012-01-21 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
I thought 11/22/63 was GREAT. I actually read a whole bunch of fabulous books while I was home at Christmas -- along with that, The Tiger's Wife and The Art of Fielding were both so, so good. I found TTW a little hard to get into, but worth it, and TAoF had awful reviews in part on Amazon, but IGNORE THEM, it's wonderful.


(Anonymous) 2012-06-19 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
Please feel free to moderate my conmmet. My goal is to just the attention of the author. I don't intend to hurt anyone's feelings. Thanks. Btw I was not able to edit my conmmet. Thought this would help.


(Anonymous) 2012-08-26 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
LukeW August 22nd, 20114:15 pm@Meketrefe go to Facebook. Type someone's name in the sraech box at the top of the screen. That's illegal in a good number of countries?@Mike your strike 2 & 3 are valid development points and should be in place. I agreeStrike 1, I disagree is any different than a site with sraech that includes user names. Most sites even have APIs for looking up user names. (also see my comment above. nice & AJAXified on facebook as well). @ Craig, three comments from Twitter discussion on this topic that are applicable to your points: in security-related UI, perceptions (and misperceptions) matter even more than in regular UI. lots of fear & misinfo out there. -@jreffell to be fair security UI concerns are valid because the user perceives them, not because the designer's logic refutes them. -@jaysondb I'd say that many designs have created artificial/wrong security perceptions. See password field and keylogging. -@lukew i agree with you both! also see: password rules that make you work hard but don't really add security -@jreffell@zeldman fair point on people using text-expander utilities that's a consideration worth looking into. Also password managers like 1password don't do very well with anything but a standard login box (3rd party sign, sraech UI (like Bagcheck, Google email login, etc.)