sugar: (dramatic chipmunk Jensen)
Let's just admit it. We've all been waiting with our little paws clasped for the inevitable Stephanie Ware-Ackles Crazycakes World Tour 2010 to hit the internet ever since Jensen and Danneel tied the knot. And it's been nearly three weeks! I was starting to give up hope. My pouty lip was starting to stick out.

Then her "daughter", a miss Bianca Ware-Padalecki, showed up and gave us 2 crazy wanks for the price of one.

I know, I know it's not nice to make fun of insane people. So I won't, I will just quote them a little:

seriously how on earth can somebody become jealous of that ugly unattractive bad teeth person,seriously Danneel Harris and Genevieve Cortese,i have a question for you.

I bet if Jared Padalecki and I weren’t married to eachother(but sad for you,we really are married in real life to eachother,since september 13,2008),he’d go find himself a woman who looks 100 million times better than your ugly tired out messed up sea urchin looking ass,you faggot ass mona lisa looking bitch.

OK, I'm laughing too hard to keep cutting-and-pasting.
sugar: (bastard people [WFG])
Look what [livejournal.com profile] lgbtfest brought us: What A Million Girls Would Kill For, an Emily-centric The Devil Wears Prada fic by [livejournal.com profile] woldy! It's lovely :)

I was gone for a while. I'm back now! Just in time for huge wank in the wankiest of fandoms. I mean, wow.

Okay, first of all, WinCon is a private event, which means the organizers have every right to refuse anyone, regardless of the reason.

Second, they seem to have provided a fairly clear reason to you, o Banned One.

Third, are you seriously demanding proof that you or your actions made one person or several people feel uncomfortable? Here's all the proof you need: you have been asked not to return. If there had been no issue then, then there would be no issue now! No one would have spoken up, but someone did. That is all anyone needs to know about it, as far as I'm concerned.

Fourth, way to amplify your own wank by about 10,000%. I never would have heard about this if the person involved hadn't started posting and commenting all over the place about it.

Fifth, the lawyering claims are jaw-droppingly hilarious. Trying to salvage the reputation of your online pseudonym by relinquishing the anonymity it offers you in this case? Really? You think that's wise? Now I've really seen it all.

I mean, this is "greatest hits"-level wank. Insert popcorn gif here. Sigh.

Profile

sugar: (Default)
Kath

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Aug. 20th, 2017 05:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags